28 Nov Green v. Conley

             This is a cost assessment in a personal injury action. The action was settled one day before the commencement of the trial. Ms. Green was initially pursuing a claim between $300,000 and $400,000 which included a claim for $136,000 for homemaking services. She settled her claim for $75,000 the day before trial. She swore an affidavit explaining that offer was accepted for health reasons. The plaintiff suffered from gestational diabetes and chose to accept the offer rather than go through the stress of trial which might potentially endanger the health of her unborn child and herself. This evidence becomes relevant to the issue of proportionality. It is my belief that an assessing officer should not rely exclusively on the settlement figure in determining proportionality of costs. Certainly, when most of the disbursements were incurred, counsel for Ms. Green did not think the case would settle for $75,000. Given that the case did not proceed to trial, it is not necessarily true that $75,000 is the true value of Ms. Green’s claim. It is the value that she was willing to accept for personal reasons....

Read More

31 Jul Kramer v. Pearce Taylor Schneiderat

             Mrs. Kramer is friends with Mr. Pearce, who is a lawyer at the firm of Pearce Taylor Schneiderat. While having dinner at his house one night, Mrs. Kramer told him that she was injured while exercising at the municipal pool. The Styrofoam water aerobics dumbbells were disintegrating, and she obtained several slivers from them in the palms of her hands. He told her to come to his office to discuss a law suit. He did not give evidence at this Legal Professions Act review....

Read More

25 Apr Gray v. Kohnert

             THE COURT:  This is an assessment of a bill of costs following the settlement of a personal injury action. The tariff items are not in dispute, but there are disbursements of $21,854.06 in dispute. The disbursements are primarily for medical legal opinions....

Read More

05 Feb Arnason v. Nerio

             Mr. Arnason was injured in a motor vehicle accident on June 6, 2008, and hired Roger Watts of Salloum Watts (the “Law Firm”) to represent him in a lawsuit against the defendant for damages. After signing a contingency fee agreement with the Law Firm in 2010, Roger Watts died unexpectedly in 2011....

Read More

07 Jun Trotter v. Nielsen

             This decision relates to an assessment of the bill of costs of the plaintiff, which is attached to the appointment filed March 28, 2013. Many of the tariff items have been agreed upon. I have made a decision on those few tariff items which were not agreed to. The most contentious issues relate to certain disbursements and those issues will be dealt with here.Background...

Read More

08 May Krenn v. I.C.B.C.

             These reasons relate to the taxation of a party-and-party bill of costs, which were awarded at Scale B in a personal injury action. There is some minor dispute about the tariff items; however, the primary issues before me are whether or not certain disbursements for expert reports were reasonable and whether the plaintiff should be entitled to recover interest on a disbursement loan.Background Facts...

Read More

16 Nov Bedoret v. Badham

             By notice of application filed June 5, 2012, the plaintiff applies to court almost three years after the collision to add the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (“ICBC”) as a nominal defendant to this action and for leave to amend its notice of civil claim....

Read More

09 Jul Tjelta (Re)

             The bankrupt, Mr. Tjelta, applies for discharge from bankruptcy. His discharge is opposed by the Trustee and by Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. He made a voluntary assignment on July 20, 2009. This is Mr. Tjelta’s first bankruptcy. Mr. Tjelta is 42 years old. For ten years prior to bankruptcy, he was a self-employed construction foreman. He is separated from his wife and has an ongoing maintenance obligation to his 16-year-old child. Mr. Tjelta is in a new partnership now, and he and his new partner have two small children. His new partner is unable to work outside the home....

Read More

20 Apr R.C.L. v. S.C.F.

             THE COURT:  This is an application for production of Elizabeth Fry records in a personal injury case. These records relate to the abuse the plaintiff suffered as a child and, presumably, include confidential details of that abuse as well as recommendations of a counsellor. The production is being opposed on the basis that the records are not relevant and that they are privileged. The application is being brought under our new Rule 7-1(1). The relevancy test in the Supreme Court Rules has now narrowed to one of direct relevance, to use the words of the section, "to prove or disprove a material fact", and it is no longer a chain of inquiry test related to any matter in question. I am not satisfied that these records will assist in proving any material fact....

Read More