27 Apr Cui v. Metcalfe
THE COURT: The plaintiffs claims in this action arise from injuries she suffered in an August 15, 2011 motor vehicle accident for which the defendant has admitted liability....
THE COURT: The plaintiffs claims in this action arise from injuries she suffered in an August 15, 2011 motor vehicle accident for which the defendant has admitted liability....
This action arises out of a December 15, 2010 helicopter accident said to have been caused by the failure of the No. 2 bearing in the Rolls-Royce engine which powered the helicopter....
Roberto Pavan suffered injuries in a September 22, 2010 accident when the car he was driving collided with a limousine driven by the defendant Remo Guolo and owned by Canusa Limos Ltd. There were five passengers in the limousine at the time of the accident, all of whom also suffered injuries and have commenced separate actions. Liability and quantum are issues in this action....
This combined bill of costs arises from actions filed by Christine Turner who was involved in two motor vehicle accidents in 2008....
The defendants apply for production, by various third party document holders, of further medical, employment, hospital, and WorkSafeBC records with respect to the plaintiff. The defendants also seek work-related information from the plaintiff....
Sandra McKeachie applied under the Legal Profession Act, S.B.C. 1998, c. 9 (LPA) for a review of a June 10, 2011 account from the Ron Perrick Law Corporation (RPCL)....
THE COURT: The defendant applies for a further examination for discovery of the plaintiff on the basis that questions asked were objected to without valid reason. In addition, the defendant seeks restrictions on intervention by plaintiff's counsel at any resumed discovery and prohibitions on plaintiff's counsel discussing with his client matters which were addressed at the first examination....
The defendant seeks an order that the plaintiff attend an independent medical examination (IME) originally scheduled to be conducted by Dr. Andrew Hepburn on Monday, September 19, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. The parties were advised that they could not expect to receive a decision in time for the scheduled appointment.Background to the Application...