18 Dec Li v. Giesinger

             This is an assessment of the plaintiff’s bill of costs arising out of her claim for damages for personal injuries sustained when she was struck by the defendant’s vehicle while riding her bicycle across a crosswalk in Prince George, B.C. on October 6, 2007....

Read More

07 Dec Gee v. Basra

             THE COURT:  There are two applications before me. The first is a defence application for an authorization for the production of certain medical records of the plaintiff, and the next is an application that the plaintiff attend an independent medical examination with a neurologist.Application for an authorization for the production of certain medical records of the plaintiff...

Read More

08 Oct Karran v. District of Squamish

            The plaintiff’s action is for damages for injuries she allegedly sustained as a result of a slip and fall at a curling rink in Squamish, British Columbia on February 12, 2015. The plaintiff now applies for an order adding Howe Sound Curling Club (the “curling club”) as a defendant on the basis that the defendant, Squamish Valley Golf Club, leases the curling facilities to the curling club....

Read More

28 Apr Beauchesne v. W.J. Stelmaschuk and Associates Ltd.

            THE COURT:  The defendant, Her Majesty The Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia, whom I will refer to in these reasons as HMTQ, applies for an order striking paragraph 21 of Part 1 and paragraph 2 of Part 3 of the notice of civil claim filed by the plaintiff in this matter as disclosing no reasonable claim under Rule 9‑5(1)(a) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules....

Read More

08 Apr Legault v. Tiapis

             The defendant, Kylie Jessica Hawthorne (“Hawthorne”) and the third party, Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (the “third party”) each apply to strike portions of the amended notice of civil claim pursuant to Rule 9-5(1) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules.II.               background...

Read More

24 Mar Cabezas v. HMTQ

             The plaintiff alleges that she was injured in a single vehicle accident on November 26, 2010 when she lost control of her vehicle due to slippery road conditions. The accident took place on Highway 101 near Trout Lake outside Sechelt, B.C. The defendants, Capilano Highway Services Company, A General Partnership, Hilbar Enterprises Inc. d.b.a. Capilano Highway Services Company, Rockline Construction Ltd. d.b.a. Capilano Highway Services Company (the “Capilano defendants”) were responsible for highway maintenance in the area where the accident occurred. The Capilano defendants employed Robert Colville and Lewis Cocker as highway maintenance workers. The plaintiff alleges that the accident was caused by the negligence of the Capilano defendants. The Capilano defendants deny liability and say that they complied with their duties. The road conditions as well as the actions of the highway maintenance workers in the hours leading up to the accident are issues for determination in the litigation....

Read More

05 Jan Mocharski v. Ly

            THE COURT:  The plaintiff makes three applications today. The first is that the defendants amend their response to civil claim; the second is that the defendant Ly submit to a further examination for discovery and answer particular questions; and third, that the defendants Ly and Mocharski provide particulars in response to demands issued by the plaintiff....

Read More

10 Sep Mackinnon v. Rabeco Holdings (1989) Ltd.

             The defendants apply pursuant to Rule 7-1(18) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, B.C. Reg. 168/2009 for an order that the officer in charge at the Langley Detachment of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (the “RCMP") produce documents concerning a criminal investigation and conviction of the plaintiff arising out of an incident which occurred on June 25, 2012 (the “June 25, 2012 incident”) and additionally an incident which is alleged to have occurred in 2009 which was investigated by police, but where no charges were laid (the “2009 incident”)....

Read More