Welcome to the Acheson Sweeney Foley Sahota personal injury case law database.

Our firm has collected and organized a number of personal injury court decisions in a publicly-accessible database, for use as a resource by law students, other lawyers and firms, as well as the general public. This database will include some of our firm’s results, as well as results from many other lawyers. For information about results from this firm only, please click here.

The British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal are the sources for all of the cases in this database; these cases are not official versions of the material produced, and were not made in affiliation with or the endorsement of the British Columbia Superior Courts.




Turner v. Dos Santos

           The plaintiff, Erin Turner, claims damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident that took place on March 11, 2010 in Richmond, British Columbia when the Honda Civic that she was driving was struck by a Mustang driven by the defendant, Walter Dos Santos, Jr....

Read More

Fifi v. Robinson

           This is an assessment of the plaintiff’s damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred October 8, 2008.  Liability is admitted....

Read More

Matheson v. Fichten

             In this action, the plaintiff claims damages for personal injuries and loss suffered as a result of a motor vehicle accident on September 3, 2009.  On February 10, 2012, Master Baker ordered that the issues of liability and quantum be severed for the purposes of trial.  Counsel advised that this severance arose in the context of the plaintiff’s application for an adjournment....

Read More

Hardychuk v. Johnstone

             The plaintiff, Riechelle Hardychuk, claims damages for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on May 20, 2006.  The defendants admit liability but dispute the nature and extent of Ms. Hardychuk’s alleged injuries and the amount of damages claimed....

Read More

British Columbia v. Tekavec

             This is an application by the plaintiff, Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of British Columbia (HMTQ) for an order that:1.         The pleadings of the defendant, Louis Peter Tekavec, be dismissed and this action proceed as though no Reply had been filed by him.Or in the alternative;2.         Both Edward Alexander Jack and the defendant, Louis Peter Tekavec, are released from an implied undertaking arising in the litigation decided in Jack v. Tekavec, 2010 BCSC 1773.3.         The defendant, Louis Peter Tekavec, must list the discovery transcripts and any other relevant documents received from Edward Alexander Jack or created in the litigation decided in Jack v. Tekavec, 2010 BCSC 1773 or his List of documents as appropriate relative to their content.4.         Edward Alexander Jack may release to the plaintiff documents or discovery transcripts received from the Louis Peter Tekavec or created during the litigation decided in Jack v. Tekavec, 2010 BCSC 1773.5.         The plaintiff may make use of the discovery transcripts from Jack v. Tekavec, 2010 BCSC 1773 as if the discovery evidence had been given in this action.And in either case:6.         The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of this application from the defendant.Background...

Read More

Maya Naks v. Hesse

             Maya Adriana Naks Williams, an infant, is the plaintiff in an action for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident which occurred on February 26, 2005.  Ms. Sawicka, her litigation guardian, is her aunt.  Her older sister, Brandy, also brings an action for damages....

Read More

Brandy Naks v. Hesse

             Brandy Ebonie Naks Williams, an infant, is the plaintiff in an action for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident which occurred on February 26, 2005.  Her aunt, Anna Sawicka, is her Litigation Guardian....

Read More

Rizzotti v. Doe

              This action is as a result of three different motor vehicle accidents that the plaintiff was involved in. The first accident occurred on June 25, 2005, on Highway 22 near Trail, British Columbia. The second accident occurred on December 29, 2006, on Columbia Avenue in Castlegar, British Columbia. The third accident occurred on September 4, 2008, on Knight Street in Vancouver, British Columbia....

Read More

Samson v. Aubin

             Mr. Manson is a single, 31-year old lifelong resident of Port Alberni. He is also the father of a 13-year old son who resides with his biological mother....

Read More

Charles v. Dudley

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIACitation:Charles v. Dudley,2012 BCSC 1301Docket: M101674 Registry: Vancouver Between: Shirley Charles Plaintiff And Matthew Dudley, Julie Valough-Buhl and Alfred Bailey Defendants Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice McEwan Reasons for JudgmentCounsel for the Plaintiff:M.J. BauerCounsel for the Defendants:J. LockePlace and Date of Trial/Hearing:Vancouver, B.C. June 25-27, 2012Place and Date of Judgment:Vancouver, B.C. September 4, 2012 I [1] The plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident on June 1, 2008. She was a passenger in a 1999 Chevrolet Silverado truck owned and operated by her boyfriend Alfred Bailey which was struck by a 2007 Hyundai operated by Matthew Dudley near the intersection of Fraser Highway and 200th Street in Langley, British Columbia. Liability is admitted by Mr. Dudley, as is the fact that he was operating the vehicle involved in the accident with the consent of Julie Valough-Buhl, its registered owner. II [2] The trial proceeded in a fashion I would have described as unorthodox until recently, with the medical evidence called before the plaintiff testified. Counsel advised that they understand this to be the preferred way to run a personal injury case. I do not know where they get this idea. If persuasion of the trier of fact is the objective, the practice of leading medical opinion unattached to any factual foundation is the most awkward way to go about it. I have observed elsewhere that doctors do not subject their patients to a forensic examination. They generally assume that what the patient tells them is true and attempt to treat their symptoms. Their observations are of assistance to the trier of fact to the degree to which they reasonably conform to the facts that have been established after the plaintiff’s assertions have been tested. It is very difficult to assimilate medical evidence provisionally, that is, with no means of sorting what matters from what does not. A trier of fact obliged to hear a trial this way must go back over such evidence to put it in context. This Court is not alone in making this point....

Read More

Brechin v. Pickering

             The plaintiff is a journeyman electrician. He lives in Castlegar, British Columbia. On March 23, 2007, he was a passenger in a motor vehicle that was struck by another vehicle on Highway 3, about 15 kilometres east of Grand Forks, British Columbia. The defendant died in the accident. There is no issue as to liability for the collision.II...

Read More

Contact us today to find the best lawyer for your case.