Welcome to the Acheson Sweeney Foley Sahota personal injury case law database.

Our firm has collected and organized a number of personal injury court decisions in a publicly-accessible database, for use as a resource by law students, other lawyers and firms, as well as the general public. This database will include some of our firm’s results, as well as results from many other lawyers. For information about results from this firm only, please click here.

The British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal are the sources for all of the cases in this database; these cases are not official versions of the material produced, and were not made in affiliation with or the endorsement of the British Columbia Superior Courts.




Henry v. Bennett

             In my Reasons for Judgment issued September 20, 2011 (indexed at 2011 BCSC 1254), I concluded that the plaintiff, Stephen Henry, was entirely liable for the motor vehicle accident that is the subject matter of this proceeding.  Accordingly, his claim was dismissed....

Read More

Kaboly-Zadeh v. Murchison

             Kayla Kaboly-Zadeh claims damages for injuries she suffered in a car accident that occurred on the Port Mann Bridge in Surrey, B.C. on November 16, 2011. The defendant admits liability for the accident....

Read More

Davidge v. Fairholm

             Glen Davidge was in his truck stopped at a light when his vehicle was struck from behind by a van driven by the defendant, Brian Fairholm.  The accident occurred on September 15, 2009.  The third party, the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (“ICBC”), admits that the defendant was negligent....

Read More

Isbister v. Delong

             These reasons are supplemental to those found in Isbister v. Delong, 2014 BCSC 1395. That decision relates to claims made by the plaintiff for damages from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. At the conclusion of the trial the parties were given leave to make written submissions on a number of issues which were not argued at the trial. These are my decisions on those issues.I.                 Interest on Loans...

Read More

Zhao v. Yu

             The plaintiff Bingchun Zhao was injured on October 4, 2008 when the vehicle he was driving was struck from the rear by a vehicle driven by the defendant, Qiang Yu.  The defendant admits that the collision was caused by his negligence and that the accident caused soft tissue injuries to Mr. Zhao’s neck and back; and caused or contributed to Mr. Zhao’s headaches.  Mr. Yu specifically denies that Mr. Zhao sustained a brain injury; and the parties disagree about the severity, duration and effect of the injuries received by Mr. Zhao as a result of the collision.  Mr. Yu also alleges that Mr. Zhao failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate his damages.FACTS...

Read More

Antrobus v. Antrobus

             The plaintiff’s claim is against her parents, William and Joan Antrobus, and her uncle, Herman Antrobus and his common-law wife Shirley Antrobus.  She commenced her action on September 26, 2007....

Read More

Crane v. Balmforth

             This action arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on March 29, 2010 on Highway 99 in Delta, B.C. (the “Accident”).  The plaintiff stopped his vehicle suddenly due to an accident in front of him and was subsequently rear ended and pushed into the vehicle in front of him.  The collision was of significant force as evidenced by the substantial damage to the rear of the plaintiff’s vehicle.  He was transported by ambulance to Peace Arch Hospital.  He was found with no acute fractures or injuries and released.  The plaintiff asserts that he suffered soft tissue injury to his mid- and upper back, to his neck, and suffers on a continuing basis pain from these injuries including headaches.  ...

Read More

Cumpf v. Barbuta

          The plaintiff claims damages arising from a motor vehicle accident of November 28, 2009 (the “Accident”)....

Read More

Prokorym v. Turpin

             The plaintiff applied for a summary trial of the issues in this defamation action, pursuant to Rule 9-7 (2) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules. The defendant did not challenge the suitability of the matter for a summary trial. As the following summary of the facts will reveal, the only remaining issue at the conclusion of the hearing was the assessment of damages. The plaintiff seeks general damages, aggravated damages, punitive damages and special costs.Factual Background...

Read More

Prokorym v. Turpin

             The plaintiff applied for a summary trial of the issues in this defamation action, pursuant to Rule 9-7 (2) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules. The defendant did not challenge the suitability of the matter for a summary trial. As the following summary of the facts will reveal, the only remaining issue at the conclusion of the hearing was the assessment of damages. The plaintiff seeks general damages, aggravated damages, punitive damages and special costs.Factual Background...

Read More

Contact us today to find the best lawyer for your case.