Welcome to the Acheson Sweeney Foley Sahota personal injury case law database.

Our firm has collected and organized a number of personal injury court decisions in a publicly-accessible database, for use as a resource by law students, other lawyers and firms, as well as the general public. This database will include some of our firm’s results, as well as results from many other lawyers. For information about results from this firm only, please click here.

The British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal are the sources for all of the cases in this database; these cases are not official versions of the material produced, and were not made in affiliation with or the endorsement of the British Columbia Superior Courts.




Best v. Thomas

            THE COURT:  On June 10, 2014, I issued written reasons awarding the plaintiff $2,735,818.16 for injuries received as a result of an accident caused by the defendant, April Thomas. My reasons are indexed at 2014 BCSC 1033....

Read More

Garford v. Findlow

             The defendants in these two actions seek an order that the plaintiff attend an independent medical examination (“IME”) with Dr. Robert Miller, a psychiatrist. The appointment with Dr. Miller is scheduled to take place on January 12, 2015. Ms. Garford refuses to attend the examination, having already submitted to defence medical examinations with a neurologist, an orthopedic surgeon and a dentist....

Read More

Petersen v. Mulrooney

             The defendant, Kevin Mulrooney, operates a paintball business known as Sniper’z Outdoor Paintball Adventures located in Chilliwack, BC. The operations take place on the Indian Reserve of the defendant, Soowahlie Band, acting through the defendant, Soowahlie Band Council....

Read More

Brandt v. Volkswagen Group Canada Inc.

             The plaintiff applies for an order pursuant to Rule 6-2(7)(c) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, B.C. Reg. 168/2009 (“SCCR”), adding Volkswagen de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (“VW Mexico”) as a defendant in this action (the “Joinder Application”). ...

Read More

Valencia v. Gardner

             The plaintiff, Emiro Castillo Valencia, claims damages for injuries he says were sustained in five different motor vehicle accidents between 2006 and 2008. The first three accidents are the subject of action VA M075049. The fourth accident is the subject of action VA M083494. The fifth accident is the subject of action VA M101744....

Read More

Kabani v. Lee

             This trial raises the issue of causation of a very significant physical disability the plaintiff asserts was caused by a low velocity, low impact motor vehicle accident (the “Accident”). The physical disability is rheumatoid arthritis, a painful auto-immune disease that bilaterally attacks the joints in the human body. For the reasons which follow, I conclude that the plaintiff has failed to prove that rheumatoid arthritis was caused by the Accident.Background...

Read More

Miller v. Marsden

             This case arises out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred nine years ago when the plaintiff Matthew Miller was 16 years old. The defendants Kathryn Marsden and Frederick Marsden admit liability for the accident but dispute the severity and impact of Mr. Miller’s injuries.II.               THE ACCIDENT...

Read More

Hurdle v. Lagore

             On the evening of August 31, 2006 at approximately 8:00 p.m., the plaintiff Mr. Hurdle was driving his motorcycle east on Hastings Street, a primary east-west thoroughfare in the City of Vancouver...

Read More

Ueda v. Rose

             This is an assessment of a bill of costs arising from a motor vehicle accident which occurred on September 16, 2009....

Read More

Hampton v. Osachoff

             This is an assessment of the bill of costs of the plaintiff, Curtis Hampton. The background facts are set out in the affidavit of Joseph Zak made and filed September 12, 2014, in paragraphs 2 through 14 as follows:A.        THE CLAIM2.         This action was brought for the recovery of damages for personal injury and loss suffered by the plaintiff as a result of a pedestrian/motor vehicle collision that occurred on February 14, 2009. At that time, the plaintiff was standing with a group of his friends at the comer of 4th Street East and Temple Street in Revelstoke, B.C. when he was struck by a Dodge Dakota pick-up truck owned by the defendants, Donald Osachoff and [Deana] Osachoff, and operated by their son, the defendant, Ryan Osachoff ("Osachoff').3.         Osachoff was subsequently charged under the Criminal Code of Canada and later pled guilty to the offence of dangerous driving causing bodily harm.4.         The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia denied liability to indemnify Osachoff and entered a third party notice in this proceeding contesting liability and quantum.5.         The plaintiff claimed general and special damages, past income loss, impairment of income earning capacity and aggravated damages.6.         The claim for aggravated damages took into account the nature of Osachoffs’ conduct and express lack of remorse.B.        THE ACTION7.         This action was commenced on January 14, 2011.8.         The trial was initially set for hearing for November 19, 2012.9.         On May 14, 2012, the plaintiff applied to adjourn the trial to enable            him an opportunity to determine the extent of his residual disabilities. The application was contested. The matter was heard by Master McDiarmid who ordered that the trial be adjourned with costs of the application awarded to the plaintiff in any event of the cause.10.       The trial was rescheduled to commence on June 9, 2014.11.       The claim was settled in May 2014 for $280,000.00 plus costs and disbursements to be assessed.C.        CURTIS HAMPTON12.       The plaintiff was 20...

Read More

Faa v. Hardy

             Tyson Faa was injured in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on December 4, 2009. Mr. Faa was a passenger in the vehicle of the defendant, Ms. Hardy. The defendant made a left turn in front of an oncoming vehicle and a substantial collision occurred, smashing the engine area of Ms. Hardy’s vehicle. An airbag discharged and protected Mr. Faa....

Read More

Sandhu v. Gabri

             In the early morning hours of April 7, 2010, the plaintiff, Parminder Singh Sandhu, was a passenger in his wife’s motor vehicle, a 2007 Nissan Sentra. Mr. Sandhu had had a couple of drinks and so his friend, Harjinder Grewal, who had not had anything to drink that evening, was driving at Mr. Sandhu’s request. The two were driving northbound on 124th Street in Surrey, British Columbia, when, without warning, a southbound 1998 Honda motor vehicle, driven by the defendant, Jaswinder Singh Gabri, attempted a left-hand eastbound turn onto 80th Avenue and collided with the driver’s side of the Nissan....

Read More

Contact us today to find the best lawyer for your case.