Welcome to the Acheson Sweeney Foley Sahota personal injury case law database.

Our firm has collected and organized a number of personal injury court decisions in a publicly-accessible database, for use as a resource by law students, other lawyers and firms, as well as the general public. This database will include some of our firm’s results, as well as results from many other lawyers. For information about results from this firm only, please click here.

The British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal are the sources for all of the cases in this database; these cases are not official versions of the material produced, and were not made in affiliation with or the endorsement of the British Columbia Superior Courts.




Gill v. Morin

             On June 4, 2004, 11 year old Gurdeep Singh Gill (“Gurdeep”) was grievously hurt when the all terrain vehicle he was then operating, of a type commonly described as a “quad”, struck or was struck by a car driven by the defendant, Lyle James Morin (“Morin”) on Harris Road in Abbotsford. The gravity of Gurdeep’s injuries was such that he was flown from the accident scene by helicopter. He suffered numerous fractures, including a compound fracture of the femur and a skull fracture. The Statement of Claim alleges that he has been left with hearing loss, balance problems and cognitive deficits....

Read More

Farrokhmanesh v. Sahib

             This was an application by the plaintiff to assess her party and party bill of costs presented following settlement of this action (the “Sahib action”) in which the plaintiff sued the defendant for injuries suffered by her in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on January 25, 2005....

Read More

Ferrier v. Johnscross Properties (B.C.) Ltd.

             The defendant, Johnscross Properties (B.C.) Ltd. (“Johnscross” or the “defendant”), has applied for judgment against the plaintiff pursuant to Rule 18A. Prior to hearing the application, counsel for the plaintiff advised that the action was to be dismissed by consent against the defendants, Jeff Queen, 611032 B.C. Ltd., Ploutos Enterprises Ltd., and John Doe doing business as Penticton Tile & Marble. A consent dismissal order is in circulation and will be entered in due course. The remaining defendants, James Palanio and 62-431 Realty Ltd., have not joined in this application....

Read More

Beazley v. Suzuki Motor Corporation

             The plaintiffs apply at a pre-trial conference to exclude the report of David L. Wood and the portions of the report of Jeya Padmanapan that deal with the statistical relationship between seatbelt use and injuries in motor vehicle accidents. The defendants oppose the applications. They submit that the applications should be deferred to trial and only determined after the witnesses have testified at trial on a voir dire. Alternatively, the defendants submit the reports are, in any event, admissible. The trial is scheduled to commence on April 19, 2010, for 60 days.BACKGROUND...

Read More

Green v. Gregory

             THE COURT:  This is an application by the third party, Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, to have the plaintiff, Wanda Lee Green, attend a medical examination with Dr. Piper, an orthopaedic surgeon, on April 19, 2010, at 2:45 p.m. at Dr. Piper's office at 102 - 65 Richmond Street, New Westminster, British Columbia. The third party also seeks an order that the third party pay the plaintiff's reasonable travel expenses to attend the examination with Dr. Piper, and indeed, as will be seen, agreements have been reached in relation to this aspect of the motion and other issues as well. The third party also asks for the costs of the application....

Read More

Hambrook v. Sandhu

             In this matter the parties have each filed a notice of motion seeking a determination by the court as to liability to pay costs on a settlement agreement entered into between them....

Read More

Booth v. Gartner

             The plaintiff claims general damages, past loss of income, diminished earning capacity, cost of future care and special damages, as a result of a motor vehicle accident on February 4, 2007. Liability is admitted and special damages have been agreed to in the amount of $12,000.BACKGROUND...

Read More

Falati v. Smith

             The plaintiff, Hourash Falati, seeks damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred on February 13, 2007. Liability is admitted. The most contentious issue in this claim is the extent of the plaintiff’s alleged pre-trial and future losses of earnings and earning capacity. The plaintiff’s position is that he lost or suffered diminished opportunities to earn income through various business ventures which he claims were delayed or frustrated by his injuries, including a new restaurant venture which he was about to get off the ground when the accident intervened.I.        Background...

Read More

Gosselin v. Neal

             In this trial, the plaintiff claims damages for injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident on January 5, 2006 (the “MVA”).  She was 39 years old at the time of the MVA.  She is now 43 years old.  She suffered injuries to her neck, right shoulder, and back.  She claims that those injuries have not resolved and that they continue to cause her pain and to restrict her activities....

Read More

Hodgins v. Street

             This is an action for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident.  In a judgment released on May 26, 2009, I awarded damages totalling $650,936.42.  Of this amount, $280,000 was awarded for future loss of earning capacity and $160,700 for future care.  My reasons for this award are indexed as 2009 BCSC 673....

Read More

Pitcher v. Brown

             On March 10, 2010 an application was brought to adjourn the two‑week jury trial scheduled for March 15, 2010. This is a personal injury matter, arising from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on or about August 24, 2004 in Kelowna, B.C., where liability has been admitted and the only issue to be tried is the assessment of damages. Counsel requested the adjournment for these reasons:          1.       Counsel for the plaintiff is not available for trial on March 15, 2010. Plaintiff’s counsel says that the date was agreed to by Ms. Pitcher on condition that her new counsel be available, and when he filed an appearance plaintiff’s counsel advised defence counsel that he was not available on this day. Defence counsel refused to adjourn the trial.          2.       Plaintiff’s counsel also indicated that the damages are connected to damages incurred in 2003, prior to the motor vehicle accident, when the plaintiff fell at the Vancouver airport. She has commenced an action (S68745) and that matter has recently been transferred to Vancouver for trial.          3.       The plaintiff says she is unable to attend the trial on March 15, 2010 because her father‑in‑law passed away and the funeral is being held on March 11, 2010. Not only is she not in a position to conduct a trial, but her husband, who is her main support person, would not be available either....

Read More

Costello v. Rafique

             Mr. Murphy Costello (“Mr. Costello”) was injured in a motor vehicle accident on October 26, 2006. Liability is admitted by the defendants. At issue is the quantum of damages owed with respect to the extent of Mr. Costello’s injuries from the relatively minor rear-end collision. A complication is that the accident took place about three months after Mr. Costello had back surgery.I.        Background...

Read More

Contact us today to find the best lawyer for your case.