Welcome to the Acheson Sweeney Foley Sahota personal injury case law database.

Our firm has collected and organized a number of personal injury court decisions in a publicly-accessible database, for use as a resource by law students, other lawyers and firms, as well as the general public. This database will include some of our firm’s results, as well as results from many other lawyers. For information about results from this firm only, please click here.

The British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal are the sources for all of the cases in this database; these cases are not official versions of the material produced, and were not made in affiliation with or the endorsement of the British Columbia Superior Courts.




E.B. v. Basi

             THE COURT:  This proceeding involves tort claims against the alleged assailants of an infant, E.B., while in foster care as well as against the Provincial Director of Child Welfare (the “Director”) and the provincial Crown (the “ministry”). E.B. apparently suffered a severe traumatic brain injury as a result of the alleged assault and requires an extremely high level of care at all times....

Read More

Patterson v. Williams

             The third party applies under Rule 9-8(5) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, B.C. Reg. 168/2009, for an order that the defendant, Jennifer Lynn Williams, pay the third party’s costs of defending the third party proceedings. ...

Read More

Sparacino v. Sparacino

             The parties to this divorce action were married in June, 1998, and separated in February, 2006.  There is no dispute about the divorce and the requirements of the Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.) [Divorce Act] have been satisfied. The primary issues before me are division of family assets and spousal support....

Read More

DeMerchant v. Chow and A-1 Fire Supplies

             The defendants/applicants seek two orders in these proceedings:          1.       That the plaintiff is competent to give evidence on his own behalf in these proceedings, and          2.       That the defendants are granted leave to examine for discovery the plaintiff at such time and place as may be decided by counsel for the parties....

Read More

Willard v. Mitchell

             The plaintiff in this personal injury action claims damages arising from a motor vehicle accident. The present application, brought by the defendant, seeks the production of medical and business records. Despite the failure of the defendant applicant to rely upon Rule 26(11) and Rule 27(22) in the notice of motion, the application was fully argued relying on those rules, without complaint from the plaintiff and, I am satisfied, without prejudice to her. Since the hearing of the defendant’s application, the new Rules have come into force and effect and Rule 26(11) is now Rule 7‑1(18) and (19), and Rule 27(22) is now Rule 7‑2(18).BackgroundMedical Records...

Read More

K.L.K. v. E.J.G.K.

             This is a family proceeding involving custody and access, property division and support. A central feature of the trial was the plaintiff’s allegation that the defendant sexually abused one of the children.Facts...

Read More

Luedecke v. Hillman

           THE COURT:  This is an appeal from an order made by Master Scarth requiring the plaintiff to attend at the office of Dr. Reebye, a physiatrist, in New Westminster at 8:30 on September 30th, 2010 and submit to a medical examination "to provide a response report pursuant to Rule 11-6(4).”...

Read More

Fillmore v. McKay

             The plaintiff’s claim is for damages for personal injuries, loss of housekeeping ability, past and future loss of income earning capacity, future care costs and special damages....

Read More

Baxter v. Mary Fus Law Corporation

             This is a registrar’s review pursuant to s. 71 of the Legal Profession Act, S.B.C. 1998, c. 9 [LPA] of two bills for legal fees and disbursements charged by Mary Fus (the “lawyer”) of the law firm, Mary Fus Law Corporation, to the client, David Baxter (the “client”)....

Read More

More v. Bauer Nike Hockey Inc.

           Darren More, now age 23, suffered a devastating brain injury playing organized ice hockey when he was 17. His accident occurred during a game on November 11, 2004, while he was playing for the Juan de Fuca Orcas, a AAA Midget team, at the Archie Browning Arena, a municipally owned rink in Esquimalt. Sucha More and Cindy More are respectively the father and mother of Darren....

Read More

Kim v. Lin

           The third party, the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, applies to have the plaintiff, Ms. Kim, attend at a medical examination before Dr. Richard Kendall who is an orthopaedic surgeon.Background...

Read More

Hough v. Wyatt

           The trial of this action, on the issue of liability only, was heard at the same time as the trial of action No. M082795, as ordered by Master Tokarek on January 4, 2010. ...

Read More

Contact us today to find the best lawyer for your case.