27 Nov Laktin v. Vancouver (City)
On the first day of this 25-day trial set for hearing with a jury, the defendants applied for an order that the action be tried by judge alone, pursuant to Rule 12-6(5)(a)(ii)....
25 Oct Nour v. Surrey (City)
This is an application brought on behalf of the plaintiff to add Brunswick and Stretchmate as defendants in this action....
27 May C.D. v. Canada (Attorney General)
The plaintiff has commenced two actions in negligence against social workers and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) officers relating to an investigation of allegations of sexual assault against her....
27 May Fidler v. Burns Lake (Village)
The plaintiffs claim is against the Corporation of the Village of Burns Lake (Burns Lake) and five members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)....
16 May Gillespie v. Pompeo
This is an appeal under Rule 23-6(8) from an order of Master Bouck dismissing the defendants application for an adjournment of the civil trial of this claim, which is scheduled to start on June 3, 2013, for five weeks before a judge of this court sitting without a jury....
20 Mar Charland v. Cloverdale Minor Baseball Association and Wheeler
The individual parties are fathers whose sons are involved in Pee Wee baseball in Cloverdale, British Columbia. This action involves an altercation between the fathers at a Pee Wee baseball game at Greenaway Park (the park) in Cloverdale on May 16, 2011. ...
24 Dec Dube v. BCAA Insurance Corporation
This is an application by the defendant, BCAA Insurance Corporation (BCAA), pursuant to Rule 9-7 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules. BCAA seeks to dismiss the plaintiffs action....
22 Nov Glenn v. Seair Seaplanes Ltd.
These are proceedings pursuant to Rule 9-4 of the Supreme Court Rules, considering points of law that arise from the pleadings. The parties consent to proceeding in this manner....
29 Oct Callan v. Cooke
This is an application on behalf of the Attorney General of Canada (the Attorney General) to strike out certain portions of the Notice of Civil Claim (Notice) of Robert Callen (the plaintiff)....
27 Jul Cheal v. Douglass
The Swiftsure defendants seek the following orders:1. The plaintiffs claim against the defendants Ethan Peter Douglass, Rochelle Lamothe, 467174 B.C. Ltd, and the said 467174 B.C. Ltd. carrying on business as the Swiftsure Lounge (collectively the "Swiftsure Defendants") be amended to remove a cause of action of:a. defamation, andb. false imprisonment;2. The plaintiff be barred from proceeding against the defendants Ethan Peter Douglass, Rochelle Lamothe, 467174 B.C. Ltd. and the said 467174 B.C. Ltd. carrying on business as the Swiftsure Lounge for both defamation and false imprisonment;3. The plaintiffs claim against the defendants Ethan Peter Douglass, Rochelle Lamothe, 467174 B.C. Ltd. and the said 467174 B.C. Ltd. carrying on business as the Swiftsure Lounge be dismissed; and4. The style of cause be amended to remove the defendants Ethan Peter Douglass, Rochelle Lamothe, 467174 B.C. Ltd. and the said 467174 B.C. Ltd. carrying on business as the Swiftsure Lounge; and5. Costs....