26 May Morgan v. Galbraith

             On April 20, 2012 I filed reasons for judgment (indexed at Morgan v. Galbraith, 2012 BCSC 576) after a nine day trial to assess damages flowing from a motor vehicle collision. I awarded the plaintiff $700,000 for future loss of earning capacity less 30% for his failure to mitigate for a total of $490,000. For past income losses I awarded the sum of $61,483 less 30% for a total of $43,038.10....

Read More

22 May Fabretti v. Gill

             On January 12, 2005 at approximately 10:00 p.m., a tragic accident occurred on the Pattullo Bridge in New Westminster (the “Accident”). The plaintiff was only 12 years old at the time. He was asleep in the rear right passenger seat beside his 10-year old sister, Amanda, who was also asleep. His father, Terry Fabretti, was driving, and his mother, Jocelyn Fabretti, was in the front passenger seat of their 2001 Mazda Tribute....

Read More

21 May Saopaseuth v. Phavongkham

             On January 15, 2011, Soukphavong Saopaseuth was injured in a motor vehicle accident (the “MVA”). Mr. Saopaseuth was the front seat passenger in the defendant’s Nissan Sentra sedan when it rear-ended another vehicle. Upon impact, Mr. Saopaseuth was thrust forward and then backward while secured by his seatbelt. He sustained soft-tissue injuries. The impact caused only the driver’s airbag to deploy....

Read More

14 May Franson v. Caldarella

             The plaintiff applies at a trial management conference to have the trial in this matter heard without a jury on the grounds that the issues require prolonged examination of documents, a scientific investigation, and are of an intricate or complex character....

Read More

13 May McLeod v. Goodman

             Sheila McLeod was injured in a motor vehicle accident on August 14, 2008. Liability is admitted on behalf of the defendants and, therefore, the issues before this court relate to an assessment of damages claimed for her injuries. Mrs. McLeod seeks damages for pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment of life, loss of past earning capacity, loss of future earning capacity, cost of future care, and special damages....

Read More

13 May Ostrikoff v. Oliveira

             The plaintiff seeks an order that he be awarded double costs of all steps taken in this proceeding following service of a certain offer to settle dated February 17, 2014.  For the reasons that follow, I grant the order.Background...

Read More

12 May Walker v. John Doe

             The defendant, the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (“ICBC”) brings this application to strike out statements made in three letters by counsel for the plaintiff which are directed at three expert witnesses whose reports are relied on by the defendant. The letters from counsel were delivered in accordance with R.11-6 (10) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, BC Reg. 168/2009 [“Rules”], and serve as the plaintiff’s notice of objection to the admissibility of each of the expert’s evidence. The language in the three letters in question is identical except for the expert’s name. The letters set out in very general terms - which could be described as “boilerplate” - the reasons why the plaintiff says the reports are inadmissible. The statement to which the defendant objects in each of the letters reads as follows:6.         We shall seek sanctions personally against [expert’s name], including but not limited to Special Costs....

Read More

08 May Bay v. Pasieka

             On January 27, 2010, following a two-day trial, the action of the plaintiff, Laurie-Ann Bay, against the defendant, Todd Pasieka, was dismissed. I ordered that the issue of costs be adjourned with liberty to the parties to apply to the court if an agreement could not be reached. Three-and-a-half years after the trial, the defendant now applies for costs. The defendant seeks costs at Scale B and double costs from November 14, 2006, the date an offer to settle was made, to the present. The plaintiff says that each party should bear their own costs....

Read More