30 Aug Bransford v. Yilmazcan

             The parties have come before me with respect to whether a structured judgment can be ordered, after the completion of a jury trial, the entering into of a judgment on the jury verdict, and a subsequent appeal....

Read More

30 Aug Brar v. Kaur

             Mr. Brar was involved in a motor vehicle accident on December 22, 2006 when the vehicle in which he was a front seat passenger was struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by the defendant Cimino....

Read More

27 Aug Ward v. Klaus

             The plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident on February 4, 2002, at the parking lot of Evans Elementary School in Chilliwack, British Columbia.  The plaintiff was driving a 1991 Pontiac Sunbird when it was hit from behind by a 1999 Buick Park Avenue driven by the defendant.  The defendant admits liability and claims no contributory negligence against the plaintiff....

Read More

27 Aug Boyle v. Prentice

             This action arises out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on July 5, 2006, on 27th Street in Vernon, BC. Liability on the part of the defendant is admitted....

Read More

23 Aug Grewal-Cheema v. Tassone

             The plaintiff claims damages for negligence arising out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred on March 23, 2007.  The vehicle being driven by the defendant Alberto Tassone rear ended the plaintiff’s vehicle.  Liability has been admitted.  I must assess the damages....

Read More

16 Aug Schmidt v. Hawkins

             On August 25, 2005, Mrs. Schmidt was driving her car on the highway between Sparwood and Invermere, British Columbia. Mrs. Schmidt’s husband was the front-seat passenger in the car; their two young children were in the back seat....

Read More

13 Aug 476605 B.C. Ltd. v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia

           This is an appeal from the decision of a Master dismissing the plaintiff’s claim. The Reasons of the Master are indexed at 2008 BCSC 777. The plaintiff’s truck was written off following an accident. The plaintiff contended that the defendant corporation did not offer appropriate compensation. The Master concluded that the claim was in substance a coverage dispute. As such, the claim had to be pursued through the procedure provided in the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 231. The court did not have jurisdiction.Facts...

Read More