30 Aug Bransford v. Yilmazcan
The parties have come before me with respect to whether a structured judgment can be ordered, after the completion of a jury trial, the entering into of a judgment on the jury verdict, and a subsequent appeal....
The parties have come before me with respect to whether a structured judgment can be ordered, after the completion of a jury trial, the entering into of a judgment on the jury verdict, and a subsequent appeal....
Mr. Brar was involved in a motor vehicle accident on December 22, 2006 when the vehicle in which he was a front seat passenger was struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by the defendant Cimino....
The plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident on February 4, 2002, at the parking lot of Evans Elementary School in Chilliwack, British Columbia. The plaintiff was driving a 1991 Pontiac Sunbird when it was hit from behind by a 1999 Buick Park Avenue driven by the defendant. The defendant admits liability and claims no contributory negligence against the plaintiff....
This action arises out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on July 5, 2006, on 27th Street in Vernon, BC. Liability on the part of the defendant is admitted....
The plaintiff claims damages for negligence arising out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred on March 23, 2007. The vehicle being driven by the defendant Alberto Tassone rear ended the plaintiffs vehicle. Liability has been admitted. I must assess the damages....
This matter proceeded on the question of liability for a motor vehicle accident that occurred on July 16, 2005 in Kimberley, British Columbia. The questions of damages and contributory negligence were adjourned generally....
The plaintiff, Kirandeep Sandher, was injured in a motor vehicle accident on September 5, 2006. The defendant has admitted liability....
On August 25, 2005, Mrs. Schmidt was driving her car on the highway between Sparwood and Invermere, British Columbia. Mrs. Schmidts husband was the front-seat passenger in the car; their two young children were in the back seat....
This is an appeal from the decision of a Master dismissing the plaintiffs claim. The Reasons of the Master are indexed at 2008 BCSC 777. The plaintiffs truck was written off following an accident. The plaintiff contended that the defendant corporation did not offer appropriate compensation. The Master concluded that the claim was in substance a coverage dispute. As such, the claim had to be pursued through the procedure provided in the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 231. The court did not have jurisdiction.Facts...
This is an application brought by the plaintiff for an order that the trial in this action proceed beginning October 4, 2010 for eight days, and costs.Background...